Employee Retirement Income Security Act Marks 50 Years – Then, Now, and What's Ahead
Welcome to SMB Matters, I’m Melissa Shimizu, Senior Counsel Benefits Compliance and Compensation at TriNet. This podcast series takes a close look at the latest news and trends on a variety of topics related to running a successful small or medium sized business.
September 2, marked 50 years that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) was signed into law in 1974. Not too sure what ERISA is all about? Let me break it down for you.
Where did ERISA come from?
Prior to 1974, employers often provided retirement benefits to employees through pensions, which are defined benefits. These defined benefit pensions generally promised that an employee would receive a specified monthly benefit payment throughout retirement, which would be funded by the employer. The amount of the benefit payment depended on several factors like the individual’s age at retirement, the number of hours the individual worked in a year, the number of years the individual worked, whether the individual was fully vested, and more.
During this time, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) was the primary regulator of these defined benefit pension plans. The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) later got involved through the Welfare and Pension Plans Disclosure Act, which required some filings and annual financial reports, but not nearly as extensive as what is required under ERISA now.
However, in 1963, the closure of the car manufacturer, Studebaker-Packer Corporation, was one of the main catalysts for ERISA’s inception. Studebaker had promised generous defined benefit pensions to its employees, but its pension plan was underfunded, and it could not provide these promised benefits. The existing regulatory scheme did not provide sufficient remedies for the impacted employees. The Studebaker closure, along with other controversies regarding unpaid pension benefits, lead to President John F. Kennedy commissioning a study on pension plans in 1963. Ten years later, on Labor Day, September 2, 1974, President Gerald Ford signed ERISA into law, thereby setting minimum standards for defined benefit pension plans and helping to ensure that employees and former employees could rely on the pension promises their employers made.
It is important to ensure employers pay promised benefits, because when employees make career choices, retirement benefits could be a major factor for them, perhaps forgoing higher wages during employment for the promise of pension benefits in retirement. Even though pensions are not as common now, (replaced by 401(k) and other retirement funds) they still exist in the public sector and in unionized workforces. Workers continue to factor in benefits when making employment decisions, and benefits such as retirement options can serve to not only recruit but retain talent.
How has ERISA evolved over time?
Over time, ERISA was further amended to not only regulate pensions, but all types of employer-sponsored retirement plans and health and welfare plans. These updates include a number of other acronyms you may be familiar with like the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA), Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA), and recently, the 2010 passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). In addition to the Department of Labor, which includes the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), and the IRS, all oversee the administration and enforcement of ERISA—and add even more acronyms to the mix!
Where does ERISA go from here?
ERISA has been amended many times, often to make retirement plan benefits for employees more secure. Most recently, the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act and SECURE 2.0 continued this trend with provisions that attempt to make saving for retirement more inclusive. For example, SECURE 2.0 includes a provision that permits employers to match student loan repayments. Prior to SECURE 2.0, generally employers could only match based on an employee’s contributions to the plan. Thus, if an employee didn’t have enough in their paychecks to contribute to their employer’s plan, they would not be able to take advantage of employer match. This provision was added to make it easier for younger members of the workforce, who may tend to have more moderate incomes and higher levels of student loan debt, to save towards retirement in a tax favored manner and benefit from employer matching provisions.
On the health care side, ERISA also continues to evolve so that public policy goals align with health plan requirements. For example, health plans are subject to the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act and any related rules and regulations seek to treat mental health and substance abuse disorders the same way that a physical health benefit like broken collar bone is treated. Mental health is more broadly considered an important aspect of health generally, which certainly was not the case when ERISA was first enacted. Before the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, group health plans could place more restrictions on accessing mental health and substance abuse treatment.
Thank you for listening to SMB Matters. If you enjoyed this episode, please leave a review on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to your podcasts. And please share it with your colleagues and be sure to subscribe to our newsletter at TriNet.com/Insights.
Also, we would love to hear from you, so please feel free to drop us a line at SMBMatters@TriNet.com. SMB Matters by TriNet is committed to providing small and medium-sized businesses with timely and relevant insights.
